Inspection Score Sheet Not Signed: Lawsuit May Be in Vain: How Lao Courts View Evidence

巡检评分表没签字，打官司可能白忙活：老挝法院怎么看证据

ໃບປະເມີນການກວດກາບໍ່ໄດ້ເຊັນ, ການຟ້ອງຮ້ອງອາດຈະເສຍເວລາ: ສານລາວເບິ່ງຫຼັກຖານແນວໃດ

Published: 2026-07-17 · LaoPaniti legal guides

You hold a thick stack of inspection records and rectification notices, ready to terminate the contract with the defaulting franchisee, but the other party says in court: "These forms were all written by you; I never saw them." The judge sees that there is indeed no signature from the other party—the probative value of this evidence is greatly diminished.

In Laos, written documents with the other party's acknowledgment have far greater probative value than oral notices or unilateral records. Today, let's discuss why inspection score sheets must be signed in writing, and how Lao courts view such evidence.

1. Unilateral Records vs. Bilateral Acknowledgment: A World of Difference in Probative Value

In practice, the inspection score sheets and rectification notices issued by the brand owner to franchisees are management tools in daily operations, but once a termination dispute arises, they become key evidence. However, if the materials you present are unilaterally prepared and never confirmed by the other party, the other party can easily challenge their authenticity—for example, claiming "I never received it" or "the content is untrue."

Conversely, if each inspection record bears the signatures or seals of both parties, the court will usually directly admit it. According to Article 8 of the Civil Code, civil relations shall follow the principles of "good faith and honesty." The act of bilateral acknowledgment itself reflects confirmation of the document's content. Therefore, during on-site inspections, always ensure that the franchisee's representative signs or seals the record, and each party keeps a copy.

2. Method of Delivery Is Also Crucial: Written Acknowledgment + Contractual Stipulation

In addition to on-site signatures, important notices (such as rectification notices and termination warnings) must be sent in accordance with the delivery method stipulated in the contract. Common practices include: sending via designated email, delivering in writing with a signed receipt, or even notarized delivery.

A more prudent approach is to explicitly stipulate in the franchise contract: "Inspection records confirmed by both parties' signatures may serve as the basis for performance assessment and termination." This way, if a dispute arises, the court or arbitration tribunal can directly invoke this clause.

Furthermore, the dispute resolution method should also be agreed upon in advance—whether to choose arbitration or court, both are recognized by Lao law. If these evidence clauses in the contract are incomplete, it is recommended to use LaoPaniti AI Contract Check to quickly identify potential issues.

3. How Do the Basic Principles of the Civil Code Affect Evidence Assessment?

Article 8 of the Civil Code establishes basic principles such as "respect for freedom and voluntariness" and "good faith and honesty." In matters of evidence, courts tend to protect documents that reflect the true intentions of both parties. Written acknowledgment records are precisely proof of voluntary and honest performance.

Conversely, if one party unilaterally creates materials that the other party has never confirmed, the court may, based on the principle of "equality before the law" (Article 10), consider that such materials cannot alone serve as the basis for a decision. Therefore, cultivating the habit of obtaining written acknowledgment in daily management is to pave the way for evidence in potential future disputes.

---

If you are dealing with a franchise dispute or want to check whether the evidence clauses in your contract are complete, feel free to use LaoPaniti's free AI consultation, contract check, and trademark search tools: https://www.123laoai.com

This article is compiled by LaoPaniti for reference only and does not constitute legal advice.

FAQ

Can inspection records without the other party's signature still be used as evidence?

They can be used as auxiliary evidence, but their probative value is weak. In practice, the court may require other supporting evidence, such as chat records or photos, but unilaterally prepared records are easily challenged for authenticity. It is recommended to have both parties sign to confirm whenever possible.

Is a rectification notice sent via WeChat legally valid?

WeChat chat records can be used as evidence, but their probative value is lower than that of written acknowledgment documents. If the contract specifies a designated email or written delivery, it is best to send in the agreed manner and retain proof of delivery.

Is a contract clause stating that 'inspection records can serve as the basis for termination' valid?

Yes, it is valid. According to the principle of freedom and voluntariness in Article 8 of the Civil Code, the parties can agree on the evidentiary effect. However, the premise is that the records themselves have been confirmed by both parties; otherwise, the clause may be difficult to enforce.

Legal basis

需要人办？相关服务在线提交 · ບໍລິການທີ່ກ່ຽວຂ້ອງ · Get it done

商业经营合规顾问

围绕经营事项梳理公司、用工、税费、合同收款、商标保护和门店合规风险，形成可跟进的服务清单。

在线提交需求 · ສົ່ງຄຳຂໍອອນລາຍ →

常用合同模板定制ກວດສັນຍາໂດຍທະນາຍແບບໄວ

根据业务场景定制租赁、劳动、买卖、服务、合作等常用合同模板。